Poe's Legal Battle with the Literati
By Lloyd Jassin
Outside of a Dog is a series that features publishing wisdom from a variety of classic and contemporary sources. As a lawyer, I'm fascinated by the economics and entrapments of publishing contracts and cases.
The New York Times reports that the literati have reached for their plagiarism pitch folks and torches. This time the literary prey is the author of a work of historical fiction whose main character is Mrs. Edgar Allan Poe. The author of The Raven's Bride is in a perilous position - a literary outcast. Ironically, Poe was vilified by New York's carnivorous literary establishment toward the end of his career. In defense, instead of the pen, Poe reached for a lawyer. Long forgotten, Poe's literary feud and lawsuit are a sad account of what happens when good writers do bad things.
In payment for for the sketch, English dished out double what Poe had heaped in front of him. The following day The Evening Mirror published English's "Reply to Mr. Poe," in which he called Poe a drunk, a forger, a fraud, a plagiarist, and, channeling Monty Python, an abject poltroon. Curiously, Poe's large head and tiny hands were spared, but not his manhood. My theory concerning English's apparent restraint, is that he had a large forehead and small hands. Petty, nasty and prideful describes both Poe and English. English painted Poe as an unprincipled poseur:
"He is not alone thoroughly unprincipled, base and depraved, but silly-vain and ignorant -- not alone an assassin in morals, but a quack in literature. His frequent quotations from languages of which he is entirely ignorant, and his consequent blunders expose his to ridicule, while his cool plagiarisms from known or forgotten writers, excite the public amazement."
Poe, no longer welcome in New York's literary salons, retreated north to a small, drafty, cottage in the village of Fordham. Blacklisted and broke, he sued the owners of The Evening Mirror (but, not English) for publishing English's rejoinder. Why Poe deployed a lawyer as opposed to picking up a pen, is unclear. In a letter to Horace Greeley, Poe wrote, "I sue; to redeem my character from these foul accusations." On February 17, 1847 a jury awarded "Mr. P. $225 damages and six cents costs." He had sued for $5,000 in compensatory damages. Within three (horrible and unhappy years) Poe was dead."Helplessly persecuted" or did Poe "invite the 'Punchy' writers .. . . to take up their pens and impale him for public amusement"? Was Godey's Lady's Book a good career move for Poe? I don't think so.
On a personal level, while not condoning possible bad behavior, I hope the author of The Raven Bride survives the persecution and returns as a full-member of the literary world. The journals that vilified Poe are long forgotten. Poe is evermore. There are second acts.
Related
Outside a Dog: Nos. 1 & 2 (Mark Twain's 1900 eBook Contract & Reserved Rights)
Libel-in-Fiction: Is Dick Cheney a Robot? by Lloyd J. Jassin
Poe Makes Appearance as Marmaduke Hammerhead in Tom Dunn English's 1844 Roman a Clef
Resources
Poe's Major Crisis: His Libel Suit & New York's Literary World (1970, Duke Univ) by Sidney P. Moss
Israfel: The Life & Times of Edgar Allan Poe (1927, Doran) by Harvey Allen
Poe's Poisoned Pen: A Study in Fiction as Vendetta (2009), by CL Givens
Tweet

Interesting that Poe himself was accused of plagiarism--right now, Lenore Hart, author of "The Raven's Bride." is accused of lifting from an earlier novel for her story, told from the pov of Poe's thirteen year old wife. It seems that there really is nothing new under the sun. (Now where did I hear that...?)
ReplyDeletePoe sued because English accused him of forgery and obtaining money through false pretenses--in other words, he was publicly libeling him as a criminal. Poe took that so seriously that he thought it went well beyond a mere literary quarrel; he wanted to have his name officially cleared.
ReplyDeleteOddly, he sued the publisher, but not English.
ReplyDelete