A Writer's Guide to Copyright Fair Use

Fair Use Uses a Four Part Balancing Test

Fair use allows authors and other creators to make reasonable use of copyrighted material without paying a fee. It functions as a free expression safety valve by allowing authors to make statements about important societal issues. Without it, copyright owners could squash criticism, commentary, news reporting, scholarship, and even research they didn't like or approve of.

Understanding Fair Use

Fair use is a defense against copyright infringement. Courts favor uses that challenge, interpret, build upon, tease, or poke fun at the original work, resulting in new insights and meaning. Such uses are known as transformative uses. Examples of transformative uses include editorials, criticism, scholarship, news reporting, teaching, and parody. The more transformative the use, the greater the likelihood the use will fit under the aegis of fair use. In addition, courts favor uses that are primarily educational or noncommercial.  Uses that displace sales or licensing opportunities for the owner of a work seldom qualify.

The Four Fair Use Factors

Using a four-factor fairness test, courts weigh the exclusive rights of copyright owners against the societal interest in the free flow of information. No one of the following factors is determinant, although factor four, which relates to economic harm to the copyright owner, weighs heavily in any fair use decision.

1.     The purposes and character of the use, including whether the use is primarily commercial. This factor also weigh the transformative nature of the use; 

2.     The nature of the work that's been copied;

3.     The amount and importance of what's quoted in relation to the original work;

4.     The effect the copying has on the market for the original work and its derivatives 

"Courts are solicitous of commercial publishers' free speech rights.  Therefore, the fact that a publication is sold does not strip it of fair use protection. Fair use determinations are based on the totality of the factors. No one factor is controlling."

Useful Fair Use Tips and Strategies

Despite the ad hoc nature of reported fair use decisions, here are general guidelines to help you ascertain if you have a viable fair use defense. 

• Fair use favors transformative uses. Are you using the work as a springboard to make new insights? Do you critique the original? Have you made a connection between the work you've copied and other works? Are you using the work to buttress your arguments or the arguments of others?
• Is the use a commercial use? While relevant, a commercial use is not dispositive. If the use can provide some social benefit, "by shedding light on a earlier work, and in the process creating a new one," the use may still be a fair use. 
•  In Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the claim to fairness diminishes, "where an original work and copying use share the same or highly similar purposes, or where wide dissemination of a secondary work would otherwise run the risk of substitution for the original or licensed derivatives of it."
• Since ideas are common property, fair use is more likely to be found using factual material.  
• Poetry, song lyrics, and visual works enjoy a high degree of protection under copyright law, so fair use tilts against the use of these works.
• Quoting from an unpublished work will expose you to greater risk than quoting previously published materials.
• The use must be reasonable in light of the purpose of the copying. The less you copy, the more likely fair use will be found. However, sometimes even a small (but important) portion borrowed from a work may qualify as an infringement.
• Synthesize facts in your own words, keeping in mind that close paraphrasing may constitute copyright infringement if done extensively.
• Lack of credit, or improper credit, weighs against finding fair use. However, giving credit will not transform an infringing use into a fair use.
• A parody (lawful), as opposed to satire (unlawful) is a work that ridicules or mocks another work. Fair use looks favorably upon parody. Make sure the parody is apparent and conjure up just enough of the original to convey your parodic points. 
• While fair use favors non-profit activities, being a not-for-profit will not automatically shield you from liability if your actions reduce the monetary incentives for creating future works. 

To sum up, don't compete with the work you copied. If the use displaces or diminishes the market for the original work, including potential licensing revenue, likely it's not a fair use. Generally, the more transformative the work is, the less the economic impact is.

Does Your LLC Protect You from Personal Liability for Infringement?

No, it does not. If you personally direct the infringement, your personal LLC or corporation will not shield you from personal liability for claims of either copyright or trademark infringement.  Under the theory of vicarious liability, infringement may arise if the managing member or corporate officer has the right and ability to supervise the infringement and a direct financial interest. Further, if you have knowledge of the infringement, and materially contribute to the infringing conduct of another or encourage or assist in the infringement, you may be liable for contributory infringement. 

 

Conclusion
 

Reminder. Fair use is a defense to copyright infringement. Unfortunately, fairness, like beauty, can be debated but not defined. If you are uncomfortable with the case-by-case nature of fair use determinations, consult with a copyright attorney. They can help you walk the sometimes tricky line between fair and foul use. By hiring an attorney, and following their advice, your good faith effort to ensure fair use applies, may have a positive impact on the measure of damages if a court rejects your fair use defense. Finally, your attorney can advise you on how to protect yourself against claims of infringement (and other media perils) with publisher's liability insurance. 

Resources

A Guide to Trademark Fair Use & Title Clearance

Trademark Registration and the Single Book Title

  

Image: Tight-Rope Walker, c.1885 (oil on canvas)

About the Artist:  Jean Louis Forain  (1852 - 1931)

 

DISCLAIMER: This article discusses general legal issues of interest and is not designed to give specific legal advice about specific circumstances. Professional legal advice should be obtained before acting upon any of the information contained in this article.

LLOYD JASSIN is a New York-based copyright, publishing, and entertainment attorney. He is co-author of the Copyright Permission and Libel Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). In addition, Lloyd has written extensively on negotiating contracts in the publishing and entertainment industries and lectures frequently on contract and copyright issues affecting creators and their publisher partners. A long-time supporter of independent presses, he was First Amendment counsel to the Independent Book Publishers Association  (IBPA) and is a member of The Beacon Press advisory board.  

You may reach attorney Jassin at jassin@copylaw.org or at (212) 354-4442. His offices are in the heart of Times Square, in The Paramount Bldg., at 1501 Broadway, FL 12, NYC, 10036. Follow the Law Firm and Lloyd on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/lloydjassin

 

How to Select a Book Title (and Not Get Sued)

Choosing the perfect book title is not just a marketing decision, it is a legal determination. It should provoke interest and curiosity in the book (or the product or service you sell on the back end) and not a lawsuit by an aggrieved trademark owner or removal of your listing via Amazon's report a violation and takedown tool.    

 

A trademark screening search will alert you if a book, podcast, or title of another creative work is likely to encounter legal problems.

 

Why Do a Trademark Screening Search? 

 

A screening search reduces the potential for trademark infringement claims. Before finalizing your title selection, it's important to do a preliminary search to determine if any similar or identical marks are used for related goods or services. While it is true that titles are not protected by copyright, if potential purchasers are likely to be confused about the source or sponsorship of a book, it could result in a trademark infringement or unfair competition claim. 

 

Making a Screening Search Part of the Process is Easy

  

A proper investigation includes using the Google search engine and the Trademark Office's 24/7 online database. These are invaluable tools for identifying obvious conflicts – identical or similar marks for related goods or services. Referred to by trademark attorneys as TESS, the free Trademark Electronic Search System database is located at http://tmsearch.uspto.gov. 

When doing a screening search, the central question is whether there is a confusing similarity to someone else's mark.  In evaluating the likelihood of confusion, the three key considerations are:

• Has the mark been registered? 
• How similar are the marks? 
• Are the goods or services related?
  

Similarities in sight, sound, and meaning, and the relatedness of the senior user's goods and services are the key vectors in any trademark infringement analysis. 

If the title you’ve selected is already registered by someone for related goods or services, absent a valid First Amendment defense (discussed later), soldier on and select another title. Put another way, if they cared enough to register their mark, there’s a good chance they are prepared to fight to protect it. 

CAUTION. Trademark rights are obtained through use, not registration.  That means you should also search the internet for marks that may raise legal issues. If seeking to register a trademark, a comprehensive full search and attorney clearance opinion is recommended. 

Free Expression and Fair Use Exceptions

Not every use of a trademark (or similar title) without permission is an infringement. There are many legitimate reasons to use a particular word or phrase as the title of a work that doesn’t have anything to do with trading on another party's goodwill, fame, or reputation. For example, words that merely describe the contents of a work are, at best, weak trademarks and receive no protection without proof that consumers associate them with a particular source. By source, the Trademark Act refers to the source of the physical or virtual goods rather than the author.

No matter how clever, single titles are not entitled to trademark registration.  However, if a single title attains secondary meaning -- a level of commercial magnetism associated with a runaway bestseller -- it can still be protected absent registration. 

Generic titles (100 Best Science Fiction Movies) standing alone are not entitled to trademark protection.­­­­ 

In analyzing whether a title infringes a trademark or another title, courts balance the right to speak freely against the trademark owner's rights. While using a disclaimer (the subject of a future post) is not a magic bullet, a prominent disclaimer can help reduce the potential for consumer confusion.

For a deeper dive on title clearance, click here. 

A Warning Before You Start Your Search

Given the subjective nature of of trademark law, deciding on your title depends on your risk tolerance, informed by search quality and legal analysis. When uncertain, it's wise to seek guidance from a trademark attorney. They can assess if your title is suitable for registration, and assist you in navigating the trademark registration maze.

How to Trademark a Book Title

A trademark registration gives you the exclusive right to use a trademark. Once you register a trademark, you can stop others from using both identical and confusingly similar marks for related goods or services.  

However, a single book title cannot be registered as a trademark unless it is used for a series of works (e.g., Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets).  In other words, a trademark can only be tied to a series of literary works, not a single title. 

The rationale for the “single title rule” is that once a book enters the public domain, it should remain there, and the public should have the right to identify it by its original title.

So how do you protect the first title in what you hope will be the next Hunger Games trilogy or Harry Potter series of fantasy novels? 

How Do I Protect the First Book in a Series?

The are to two ways to acquire trademark rights. The first is based on being the first to use the mark in connection with the sale or marketing of specific goods or services. The second is to be the first to file an Intent to Use application with the Patent and Trademark Office. After the PTO trademark examiner approves your Intent to Use application, you will have six months within which to file a Statement of Use. If you need more time to publish the second book in the series, you can file for multiple six-month extensions. By filing an Intent to Use application, you are staking out a claim to the title. Assuming your application meets the minimum filing requirements when the second book in the series is published and a Statement of Use is filed, the Trademark Office will re-evaluate the application. The key benefit of filing on this basis is that an Intent to Use application will temporarily block other later filed trademark applications for identical (or confusingly similar) marks for related goods.

When you obtain the registration for your title, the date you filed the Intent to Use application will serve as the date of first use. That gives you priority over those who began using the trademark after you filed.

A slightly different process is involved if you have an established book series. In either instance, you will need to publish book two in the series to obtain a federal registration.

 

If You Can't Protect a Single Title, Protect the Business or Website

While you can't register a single book title, you may be able to register a trademark for related goods or services, e.g., your business or a companion website. If consumers would reasonably assume that the owner of a product or service gave permission to publish a book with a confusingly similar title, but they didn’t, that deception may rise to the level of unfair competition (discussed later). 

 

Tip. Remember, trademark infringement is not simply a book-to-book, blog-to-blog, or app-to-app comparison. While conventional wisdom says you can't compare apples to oranges, they are both grown in orchards, are considered a fruit and are sold in the same section of your local supermarket. That makes them related for purposes of trademark law. If you don't have a book series, register the mark for the business behind the book, the website, or a related product or service. 

Unfair Competition

Unfair competition law is commonly used as a cudgel to go after bad actors who try to deceive consumers into falsely believing their goods (including books, blogs, and businesses) have been approved or endorsed by others. Even where a trademark has not been registered, it’s a violation of unfair competition law – and commercial morality -- to misrepresent the source or approval of a creative work.

Did you know the trademark for an existing business could prevent you from using a book title?

Suppose you are the owner of a successful business.  Under those circumstances, if consumers saw an unauthorized book with a confusingly similar title to your company and believed it was endorsed by you, that deceitful practice would fall under unfair competition law. 

Case & Comment. In a case involving the Ralph Lauren Polo brand, a court permanently stopped the unauthorized use of the name Polo for a lifestyle magazine. In granting the injunction, the court rationalized that the magazine and Ralph Lauren’s Polo brand were associated with fashion, elegance, and affluent lifestyles in the public's mind. While the First Amendment will allow you to write a book about Ralph Lauren and the fashion brand’s cultural significance, you cannot ride on Ralph Lauren’s designer coattails to boost your business by falsely implying an association when none exists.

For a deeper dive on trademark fair use and title clearance, click here.  

###

TITLE CLEARANCE CHECKLIST

1.  Avoid titles that would confuse people into mistakenly believing that your work is associated with, endorsed by, or licensed for use by another party.    

2.  Likelihood of confusion (the test for trademark infringement) isn’t just about the confusion between similar literary titles. Protectable titles in one media (movies, video games, podcasts) may be protected in different media (books, sound recordings) if there is a likelihood of confusion.

3. In evaluating search results, consider the following:   

. Does the word or phrase have widespread public recognition?

. How similar is the word or phrase to your proposed title?

. Is the word or phrase used for related goods or services?

4.  Important! Marks only need to be confusingly similar, not exactly alike. Don’t ignore descriptive marks that have become associated with a single source over time.   

5.  Protectable titles in one media may be protected in different media if they are marketed through the same trade channels and sold to the same class of consumers or if it’s reasonable for consumers to believe the trademark owner approved the use of the title. 

6.  Descriptive terms that have not achieved public recognition due to widespread media attention and strong sales are not protected under trademark law and cannot serve as the basis of an infringement claim. 

7.  Not just words, but the look and feel of a book jacket can infringe an existing trademark. Courts look at the total image of the book cover (format, lettering, distinctive words, illustrations, colors used, and layout) to ascertain if there’s a likelihood of confusion.

8.  The mere use of a trademark in a title is not an infringement if the title is (a) artistically relevant to the underlying work and (b) no explicit suggestion is made that the trademark owner endorsed, sponsored, or approved the work.  See #7, #14

9. A single book or other creative work title is not entitled to trademark registration unless used for a series of creative works. See #10

10. While a single title for a creative work (e.g., book, movie, or song) cannot be registered as a trademark if it becomes broadly popular and associated with a single source, especially when it starts generating spin-offs and merchandise licensing tie-ins, it may be protected under unfair competition law.  

11.  It is fair use if you use a trademark in its descriptive sense to truthfully describe the trademark owner’s goods or services, provided there's no suggestion that the trademark owner endorsed, sponsored, or approved the work.    

12.  Search for registered trademarks using the Trademark Office’s free TESS database.  Next, search your favorite search engine for common law (unregistered) marks for related goods and services. If you intend to register your title after you've ruled out obvious conflicts, obtaining a full search and registrability opinion is highly recommended. 

13.  While title clearance and trademark searches are similar, it is best to work with a trademark attorney to register a series title or the name of a business.  They can tell you if the mark is registrable and improve the chances of registration.

14.  WHEN IN DOUBT, CONTACT A TRADEMARK ATTORNEY. 

For More Information:

Contract attorney Lloyd Jassin at jassin@copylaw.org or at (212) 354-4442.  His offices are in the heart of Times Square, in The Paramount Bldg., at 1501 Broadway, FL 12, NYC, 10036.  Follow the Law Firm and Lloyd on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/lloydjassin 

DISCLAIMER / TERMS OF USE

Not Legal Advice.  The information contained in this blog is intended as general advice.  Because the law is not static, and one situation may differ from the next, we cannot assume responsibility for any actions taken based on information published here.  Be aware that the law may vary from state to state.  Therefore, this blog cannot replace the advice of an experienced attorney.  No attorney-client relationship is created by your access to or use of this website.   Contacting us by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.  If you wish to establish a professional relationship, it must be done through a mutual agreement in writing.  Please do not send us any confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established.

Attorney Advertising.  While intended as general advice, this blog and its contents may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions.  Hiring an attorney is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertising.  Past results are no guarantee of future results. 

Limitation of Liability.  We disclaim any liability, loss, damage, injury, or cost (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, lost profits, or data) caused by the contents of this blog or website. 

Links.  This website contains links to third-party websites and other resources. These links are provided solely for your convenience and for educational purposes.  They should not be construed as endorsements by the Law Offices of Lloyd J. Jassin. 

Jurisdiction.    Using this website, you have irrevocably agreed to the U.S. federal and state courts' sole and exclusive jurisdiction and venue in New York City, USA.  Any action, suit, or proceeding involving the use of this website, the information contained in this website, to the extent permitted by federal law, will be governed by the laws of the State of New York (excluding New York's choice of law rules) in the absence of applicable federal law.

Trademarks.  Copylaw is a registered trademark of the Law Office of Lloyd J. Jassin

© 2022 Lloyd J. Jassin  COPYLAW is a service mark of Lloyd J. Jassin

Related Posts 

Trademark Law and Book Titles

Common Copyright Permission Myths

 

Why You Should Add a Trademark Search to Your Editorial Process

Protecting Book Titles

Integrating a trademark search into your editorial process is a strategic and proactive measure to avoid infringement, protect your brand, and prevent legal challenges. 

 

In book publishing, trademark, and unfair competition laws are frequently used to combat deceptive practices. These laws target those who attempt to mislead consumers by falsely suggesting that their goods, including books, blogs, and businesses, carry third-party endorsements or approvals. 

 

Therefore, before forging ahead with the title of a new book or book series or the name of a new publishing company, it's advisable to conduct a trademark screening search to ascertain its legal availability. Otherwise, if the name you've selected closely resembles an existing trademark linked to related goods or services, it could be deemed as trademark infringement. Further, if the trademark owner has registered their trademark with Amazon's Brand Registry, they can use Amazon's takedown tool for the swift and frictionless removal of the infringing book. Worse still, the potential for litigation looms. 

Trademark is the New Copyright

In an era where AI-generated content increasingly competes with human-authored works for visibility and sales, the struggle for discovery on platforms like Amazon intensifies. The above sub-heading, "Trademark is the New Copyright," aptly captures this evolving landscape. As AI-generated books flood the market, distinguishing oneself as a trusted source becomes paramount. Building an author brand and securing trademark rights in series titles or company names not only establishes credibility but also acts as a beacon of authenticity amidst the deluge of algorithmically generated content. Therefore, the strategic adoption of trademarks serves as a proactive defense against legal complications, reinforcing the imperative of conducting trademark screening searches before finalizing any branding decisions. In essence, trademarking isn't just about legal protection—it's about fortifying one's position as a reliable creator in an environment where trust is increasingly elusive.

 

Did you know that a trademark for goods or services may prevent you from using a book title?

In a case involving the Ralph Lauren Polo brand, a court permanently stopped the unauthorized use of the name Polo for a lifestyle magazine. In granting the injunction, the court rationalized that both the magazine and Ralph Lauren's Polo brand were associated with fashion, elegance, and affluent lifestyles in the public's mind. While the First Amendment will allow you to write a book about Ralph Lauren and the fashion brand's cultural significance, you cannot ride on Ralph Lauren's designer coattails to boost your business by falsely implying an association when none exists.

Pro Tip #1. If the name of your existing business is evocative, memorable, and differentiating, consider it as the title of your book. If consumers were to see a  confusingly similar book title and reasonably believed it was associated with your business, you may have a viable unfair competition or trademark law - notwithstanding the so-called single title rule.   

Making a Title Screening Search Part of the Process is Important

The focus of the analysis is the likelihood the public will believe your book was published or approved by someone else, including a well-known brand owner. The most important likelihood of confusion factors are:  (a) the similarity of the marks, (b) the relatedness of the goods or services, which could be a book series, a podcast series, an online course, consulting or coaching services), and (c) the marketplace strength of the mark.

A knock out search is a trademark clearances search which helps identify identical marks, and those in close resemblance. The Trademark Office's free online database of every federal trademark registered or applied for in the U.S. is invaluable for identifying identical and similar marks for related goods or services. Known as TESS (Trademark Electronic Search System), the database is located at http://tmsearch.uspto.gov.  

If the title you've selected is already registered by someone for related goods or services, absent a First Amendment defense, soldier on and choose another title. If they cared enough to register their mark, there's a good chance they are prepared to fight to protect it.  

CAUTION. Trademark Office search results are not a reflection of the real world. They do not include unregistered marks. A full search by a professional trademark search firm, including state trademark databases and internet sources, is recommended if registration is contemplated.

Important! Not every use of a trademark (or similar title) without permission is an infringement. There are many legitimate reasons to use a particular word or phrase in the title of a creative work that doesn't have anything to do with trading on another party's goodwill, fame, or reputation. 

Trademark Registration Certificate

Most nonfiction book titles simply describe the contents of the book. Words that merely describe the contents of a book are, at best, weak trademarks and receive no protection without proof that consumers associate them with a particular source. By "source," the Trademark Act refers to the source of the physical or virtual goods rather than the author. While single titles are not entitled to trademark registration if a single title attains secondary meaning -- a level of commercial magnetism associated with runaway bestsellers -- it can be protected. In analyzing whether a title infringes a trademark or another title, courts balance the right to speak freely against the rights of the trademark owner. While using a disclaimer (the subject of a future post) is not a magic bullet, a prominent disclaimer can help reduce the potential for consumer confusion.

For additional tips on selecting a book title, click here.

A Warning Before You Start Your Search

Because of the malleability of trademark law, evaluating a search report is as much an art as it is science.  Put another way, the decision to move forward may come down to how much risk you are willing to take, which is a business decision informed by the quality of the search and the legal analysis. When in doubt, consult a trademark attorney. Your trademark attorney will advise if your mark is even registerable as a trademark.  Additionally, they will help you navigate the trademark registration maze.                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

How to Protect a Single Book Title (and the Business Behind it)

The rationale for the single title rule is that once a book enters the public domain, it should remain there, and the public be allowed to identify it by its original title. So how do you protect a series title, even though you haven't published the second book in the series?

While the first book in a series cannot be registered, the Trademark Office will allow an author to file a trademark application on an Intent to Use basis. Assuming your application meets the minimum filing requirements when the second book in the series is published and a Statement of Use is filed, the Trademark Office will re-evaluate the application. A key benefit of having an Intent to Use application is the filing date will serve as the date of first use if you complete the registration process. Another advantage is your application will block other later filed trademark applications for identical or confusingly similar marks for related goods, including series titles.  

When you obtain the registration for your title, the original filing date will serve as the date of first use. That gives you priority over those who began using the trademark after your filing date.

A slightly different process is involved if you already use the mark for an established book series. In either instance, you will need to publish book two in the series to obtain a federal registration.   

 

While you can't register a single book title, you may be able to register the trademark used by the business behind the book. So, for example, if consumers reasonably assume that the owner of a fashion consulting was the author of a book on fashion design and marketing, but they weren't, that confusion may rise to the level of unfair competition. 

 

Comment. While conventional wisdom says you can't compare apples to oranges, they are both grown in orchards, are considered fruit, and sold in the same section of your local supermarket, making them related for trademark law purposes. Trademark infringement is not simply a book-to-book, blog-to-blog, or app-to-app comparison. 

  

How to Trademark a Book Title 

Once you have selected your title, you or your attorney can file either an Intent to Use trademark application or one based on actual commercial use online at www.uspto.gov. Assuming your application meets the minimum filing requirements, it will be assigned to an examining attorney for review. If there are irregularities with the application, the examiner will issue an Office Action. An Office Action states the legal basis for a refusal to register. Some refusals are relatively easy to overcome, e.g., unacceptable specimen refusals and improper description of goods and services.

Pro Tip. A standalone book title cannot be registered as a trademark unless it is later used for a series of works (e.g., Harry Potter #1, Harry Potter #2). 

Substantive refusals include confusingly similar to a mark in an existing registration or pending application. Since a trademark must be distinctive, another common refusal is the mark merely describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the goods or services covered in your application. Refusals to register are par for the course. Some can be overcome by cogent legal arguments. However, those with fatal flaws cannot. If the objection is minor, the trademark examiner may call you or send you an informal email requesting information. But, because trademark examiners cannot provide legal advice, the Trademark Office recommends that you use the services of a law firm familiar with Trademark Office practices. 

Keep Track of Trademark Office Deadlines

A registered trademark can last forever, provided timely renewal applications are filed and the mark remains distinctive for the goods or services it is linked to. The following is a brief United States Patent & Trademark Office overview on how to maintain your trademark:

For a trademark registration to remain valid, an Affidavit of Use (Section 8 Affidavit) must be filed: (1) between the fifth- and the sixth year following registration, and (2) within the year before the end of every ten-year period after the date of registration. The registrant may file the Section 8 Affidavit within a grace period of six months after the end of the sixth or every tenth year, with payment of an additional fee. The registrant must also file a Section 9 renewal application (Section 9 Renewal) within the year before the end of each successive 10-year period following the date of registration, or within a grace period of six months after that, with payment of an additional fee. Assuming the Section 8 Affidavit and Section 9 Renewal are timely-filed as indicated above, the registration will be renewed for a 10-year term. If the Section 8 Affidavit and Section 9 Renewal are not timely filed, the registration will be canceled. Registrations canceled due to the failure to file a Section 8 Affidavit and Section 9 Renewal cannot be revived or reinstated.

Why Use a Trademark Notice?

 
Only with federal registration may you use the coveted ® symbol. If your mark is unregistered, you may use a superscript ™ after the mark. While trademark notices are not legal requirements, they have legal significance. Like a "No Trespassing" sign, a trademark notice gives notice of your rights. That makes asserting a good faith defense more difficult for a trademark infringer. While willfulness is not a precondition to a profit award, willful infringers are treated more harshly than innocent ones, including, in exceptional cases, awarding attorneys' fees.

 

Related Posts 

How to Choose a Book Title and Not Get Sued

Trademark Law and Book Titles

Common Copyright Permission Myths

 

 © 2022 Lloyd J. Jassin  COPYLAW is a service mark of Lloyd J. Jassin

DISCLAIMER: This article discusses general legal issues of interest and is not designed to give specific legal advice pertaining to specific circumstances.   Professional legal advice must be obtained before acting upon any of the information contained in this article.

12 Common Copyright Permission Myths

Though you may not believe all twelve of these myths, familiarity with them can

free your book or blog from legal hassles. Get it wrong, and an aggrieved copyright owner can block or remove your work by filing a simple online takedown notice -- all without filing a complaint in court.  Worse still, it can spark costly and time-consuming litigation.  

1.       There's no copyright notice, so no permission is required.    

Not true.  Since March 1, 1989, copyright notice has been optional. Before that date, a copyright notice was mandatory, and a work published without a notice risked the loss of copyright protection if not promptly and adequately corrected.

2.       If I give credit, I don't need permission.

Not true. Giving proper credit is not a defense against copyright infringement. Copyright infringement is using a work without the copyright owner's permission.  By contrast, you can plagiarize material not protected by copyright simply by taking credit for it. 

3.       I don't need permission because I only use a few words.

Not necessarily. How much you can borrow is a legal gray area. Sometimes, a small but important portion borrowed from a work can infringe. Since copyright law encourages creativity and innovation, courts may excuse specific socially productive but unauthorized uses. Those uses are called fair uses.  Fair use is a defense against the rigid application of copyright law. It is determined on a case-by-case basis. It considers what's been borrowed, how much was borrowed, how it was used, its importance, and the economic impact it may have on the original.  If you borrow the "heart" of a work, it weighs against fair use. Creative works are less amenable

to a fair use defense.    
 

4.       I don't need permission because I will adapt the original work.

No. You can't make a work your own by adapting it without permission.  Copyright law grants copyright owners the exclusive right to control modifications to their work. 

5.       Since the work is in the public domain, I don't have to clear permissions.

Not necessarily.  For example, a book or motion picture may have fallen into the public domain for technical reasons, but there may still be copyrights to contend with. While a book may be in the public domain, photos or other materials that appear in the book may remain legally protected.  Similarly, the composer of an in-copyright soundtrack to an otherwise public domain film can restrict the exhibition of that film by claiming a right to the music within.  If a character falls into the public domain, the former copyright owner may still stop the commercial use of that character if the use falsely implies their support of the use.         

6.       My publisher will handle the permissions.

Probably not.  Most publishers place that burden of clearing and paying for permissions on the author's shoulders.   

7.       I can always obtain permission later.

Later may be too late. Copyright owners have the unfettered right not to grant you permission.  However, it is better to know now than later that a critical component of your work cannot be cleared for use.    

8.       Since I plan to use it for nonprofit educational purposes, I don't need permission.

Not necessarily.  The issue isn't the user; it's how the work is used. If the use falls outside the bounds of fair use -- even a nonprofit educational institution can be held liable for copyright infringement.  

9.       I don't need permission because the work I want to use is more than 75 years old.

Not necessarily. For works published after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the author's life plus another 70 years.  For a pre-1978 work by a sole author, the maximum term of copyright protection is 95 years from the date the work was published or registered.  For a work created by an employee within the scope of their work or a specially commissioned work, copyright persists for 95 years from publication or 120 years from the date of creation, whichever expires first.

10.      The material I want to quote is from an out-of-print book. Out-of-print means that the work is in the public domain.  Correct?

Not necessarily.  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright.  When a book goes out of print, it usually means it is no longer profitable. While that may trigger an author's right to reclaim their copyright, it doesn't mean the book is in the public domain. See #9 above. 

11.     A Creative Commons ("CC") license means I can use the material without permission.  

Yes, but restrictions may apply.  A CC license allows specific uses for free. What those allowable uses are will vary.  For example, some CC licenses place restrictions on commercial and uncredited uses.  Some permit modifications; others may not.  To determine what is allowable, you must read the license carefully.  
  

12.    I found a photo on the Internet.  Since it was uncredited, I can use it in my book.    

Not true.  The ease with which users can upload or download online content nor the fact that content was posted anonymously on the internet places it in the public domain. 

 

 

Related:
A Primer on Fair Use

            Book Title Clearance & Trademark Registration Guide

            Book Contract Negotiation Checklist

LLOYD J.  JASSIN has practiced publishing, entertainment, and trademark law for over two decades.  Before becoming an attorney, he was Director of Publicity for Prentice Hall Press, a division of Simon & Schuster.  He is co-author of The Copyright Permission and Libel Handbook (John Wiley & Sons).  Contact: The Law Offices of Lloyd J. Jassin, 1501 Broadway 12th FL, New York, NY 10036 | (212) 354-4442 (tel.) | Jassin@copylaw.com www.copylaw.org | Twitter

DISCLAIMER:  This article is not intended as legal advice.  Because the law is not static and one situation may differ from the next, the author assumes no responsibility for actions taken based on information contained in this article.  Furthermore, be aware that the principles contained in this article are subject to exceptions and qualifications.  Thus, when in doubt, seek legal advice from an experienced copyright or media law attorney, or err on the side of caution and obtain permission or an appropriate release.